Trumps War on Big Law Means Its Harder to Challenge the Administration

Published: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 10:00 am

Big Law Firms Retreat from Challenging Trump Administration

Following President Donald Trump's return to office, a chilling effect has spread through some of the nation's largest law firms, impacting their willingness to take on cases that could be perceived as adversarial to the administration. This shift has raised concerns among advocacy groups and civil rights organizations, who rely on pro bono legal support to challenge government actions.

The article details how some major law firms are declining to represent clients challenging the Trump administration, including those involving environmental protections, LGBTQ+ rights, police accountability, and cases involving elected Democrats or federal workers. This reluctance stems from fears of retaliation, as the administration has issued executive orders targeting firms with ties to Trump's adversaries. These orders have included restrictions on access to federal buildings, termination of government contracts, and revocation of security clearances.

The article highlights specific instances, such as Winston & Strawn declining to represent FBI agents investigating the January 6th Capitol attack, and the American Bar Association struggling to find representation in a lawsuit against the administration. Additionally, the article notes that some firms have entered into settlements with the Trump administration, agreeing to provide pro bono support for Trump-approved causes.

The impact of this shift is being felt by organizations like the National Police Accountability Project and Julian, a nonprofit investigating civil rights violations. These groups are finding it increasingly difficult to secure pro bono legal assistance, hindering their ability to pursue lawsuits and challenge potential abuses of power.

BNN's Perspective:

While it's understandable that law firms may be wary of political repercussions, the retreat from providing pro bono legal services raises serious concerns about access to justice and the ability to hold the government accountable. The potential chilling effect on civil rights and environmental protections is a significant issue that warrants close monitoring.

Keywords: Trump administration, law firms, pro bono, legal challenges, executive orders, civil rights, police accountability, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental protections, FBI, January 6th, retaliation, access to justice, advocacy groups, Winston & Strawn, American Bar Association.

Full Story