The White House Is Big Mad That a Court Blocked Trumps Tariffs
3 minute readPublished: Thursday, May 29, 2025 at 9:28 pm
White House Slams Court Block on Trump's Tariffs, Accusing Judiciary of Overreach
The White House is in a heated battle with the judiciary over President Donald Trump's attempts to impose tariffs on U.S. imports. Officials are accusing the courts of a "judicial coup" after rulings challenged the legality of these tariffs.
The core of the dispute centers on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1970s law that allows the president to implement embargoes and sanctions during a national emergency. Trump has cited IEEPA as justification for imposing steep retaliatory tariffs on major trading partners, sparking economic concerns across various sectors.
On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under IEEPA. A federal judge in the District Court for the District of Columbia echoed this sentiment the following day. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the trade court's ruling on Thursday, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.
White House officials have responded with strong criticism. Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller labeled the situation a "judicial coup," while Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused the judges of abusing their power and attempting to undermine Trump's authority. Peter Navarro, a Trump trade advisor, also voiced his disapproval, even changing the subject when the host pointed out that one of the judges was appointed by Trump.
The article highlights that Trump could bypass this legal wrangling by seeking congressional approval for the tariffs. However, this is unlikely, as even Republicans in Congress are wary of the economic damage the tariffs could inflict. The White House maintains that the president already possesses the necessary authority, but the courts disagree, leading to a clash over the separation of powers and the role of the judiciary.
BNN's Perspective: This situation underscores the ongoing tension between the executive and judicial branches. While the White House's frustration is understandable, the judiciary's role in interpreting laws and ensuring checks and balances is crucial. The administration's rhetoric, however, seems to undermine the very foundations of the legal system.
Keywords: Trump tariffs, IEEPA, White House, judicial coup, tariffs, trade, court ruling, Stephen Miller, Karoline Leavitt, Peter Navarro, U.S. Court of International Trade, economic impact, national emergency, separation of powers, Congress, legal battle, import tariffs, trade policy, Donald Trump.