The tsars align

Published: Friday, March 20, 2026 at 9:50 am

The Rise of "Tsars" and the Expanding Reach of Government

A recent analysis of the term "tsar" in Google's Ngram Viewer reveals a correlation between its usage in printed materials and the growth of governmental power. The frequency of the term's use increased significantly, particularly during periods of government expansion, such as the 1960s, the 1980s, and the 1990s and 2000s, peaking in 2016. This trend suggests a link between the appointment of "tsars," or individuals with specialized advisory roles, and the increasing size and scope of government.

In the United States, the use of "tsars" has varied across presidential administrations. While Barack Obama appointed the highest number of official "tsars," followed by George W. Bush, Donald Trump's administration saw a significant reduction in these appointments. Currently, only a few of Trump's "tsars" remain in their positions.

Across the Atlantic, the United Kingdom has also embraced the concept of "tsars." Research from Kings College, London, indicates that over 230 policy "tsars" were appointed between 1997 and 2013. The practice began under the Labour Party and continued under subsequent governments. These advisors, often wielding considerable influence, are frequently praised for their ability to expedite policy implementation.

The current Labour government, led by Keir Starmer, has recently announced the appointment of an "Islamophobia tsar" as part of its plan to address social cohesion. This role, officially titled "special representative on anti-Muslim hostility," has drawn criticism due to the lack of a legal basis for the concept of anti-Muslim hostility. Critics argue that the definition of anti-Muslim hostility is vague and contradictory, potentially infringing on free speech rights. The government's plan also includes abolishing jury trials for certain offenses, raising concerns about the erosion of legal protections.

BNN's Perspective:

The trend of appointing "tsars" and expanding government influence raises concerns about the balance of power and the potential for overreach. While specialized advisors can offer valuable expertise, the concentration of power in unelected officials and the potential for restrictions on free speech warrant careful scrutiny. It is crucial to ensure that governmental actions are transparent, accountable, and do not undermine fundamental rights.

Keywords: tsar, government, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, United Kingdom, Labour Party, Islamophobia, free speech, policy, advisory roles, Keir Starmer, anti-Muslim hostility, legal basis, jury trials, social cohesion, government expansion, political analysis

Full Story