Supreme Court argument on birthright citizenship shouldn't be happening
3 minute readPublished: Friday, May 16, 2025 at 12:01 am
Supreme Court Grapples with Birthright Citizenship, Again
The Supreme Court recently heard arguments regarding President Trump's executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship, a move many legal experts deem unconstitutional. The core issue isn't whether birthright citizenship itself is valid, but rather the scope of nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts blocking the order.
The article highlights the hypocrisy of Republicans, who previously embraced broad injunctions when they aligned with their political goals. Now, they're criticizing these same legal tools when used to restrain Trump's actions. The administration, represented by Solicitor General John Sauer, is seeking to limit the reach of these injunctions, potentially allowing the deportation of individuals in certain states while the legal battle continues.
The article points out the absurdity of this approach, which would create a patchwork of citizenship across the country. It also criticizes the administration's lack of a coherent legal theory to justify the executive order and its reluctance to address the core constitutional question. Justice Kagan questioned the administration's plan for those who would be wrongly deported, and Sauer's response was vague and unconvincing.
The author suggests that the administration's strategy is to delay and obfuscate, potentially causing irreparable harm to individuals by stripping them of their citizenship and deporting them before a final ruling. The article concludes with a pessimistic outlook, suggesting that the conservative justices may be sympathetic to Trump's request, potentially allowing him to chip away at birthright citizenship in a piecemeal fashion.
BNN's Perspective: This case underscores the politicization of the Supreme Court and the erosion of legal consistency. While the debate over nationwide injunctions is complex, the administration's focus on procedural maneuvering rather than the merits of the case raises serious concerns about the rule of law and the potential for lasting damage to individuals and families. The court's decision will have significant implications for the future of citizenship in the United States.
Keywords: Supreme Court, birthright citizenship, Trump, executive order, nationwide injunctions, John Sauer, constitutionality, deportation, legal, citizenship, conservative justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, 14th Amendment, legal battle, unconstitutional, Republicans, legal theory, Solicitor General, court case, immigration, citizenship rights.