Newtok, Alaska, Was Supposed to Be a Model for Climate Relocation. Heres How It Went Wrong.
3 minute readPublished: Thursday, May 29, 2025 at 10:00 am
Climate Change Relocation in Alaska: A Federal Failure?
MERTARVIK, Alaska - The relocation of the Alaskan village of Newtok to Mertarvik, a project designed to be a model for communities threatened by climate change, is facing significant challenges, raising questions about the federal government's ability to manage such complex endeavors. The move, costing over $150 million, was intended to provide a safe haven for nearly 300 residents fleeing the sinking village near the Bering Sea. However, the new village is plagued by infrastructure failures, including a lack of running water, intermittent electricity, and deteriorating homes.
The project, funded by multiple federal agencies, has been criticized for a lack of coordination and oversight. The Newtok Village Council, tasked with managing the relocation, lacked the necessary expertise, leading to high turnover and internal conflicts. Residents report significant issues with newly constructed homes, including water damage, mold, and inadequate insulation, with some homes failing to meet minimum building codes.
Federal auditors have long emphasized the need for a lead agency to coordinate climate relocation efforts. While the Biden administration attempted to address these concerns, the Trump administration removed key reports and froze crucial funding. This lack of consistent federal support has left the community struggling to adapt, highlighting a broader national problem in addressing climate change-induced displacement.
The situation in Mertarvik mirrors the challenges faced in other relocation projects, such as Isle de Jean Charles, Louisiana. Both projects have been hampered by disjointed funding, bureaucratic hurdles, and a perceived neglect of traditional knowledge and cultural needs. The Newtok experience underscores the urgent need for a more comprehensive and coordinated federal response to climate change, one that prioritizes community involvement, technical expertise, and long-term funding.
BNN's Perspective: The situation in Mertarvik is a stark reminder of the human cost of climate change and the complexities of adaptation. While the federal government has a responsibility to provide support, the Newtok case highlights the need for a more streamlined and culturally sensitive approach. A collaborative effort involving federal agencies, local communities, and expert consultants is crucial for the success of future relocation projects.
Keywords: Newtok, Mertarvik, Alaska, climate change, relocation, federal government, infrastructure, housing, funding, climate adaptation, Yupik, permafrost, FEMA, BIA, HUD, climate change refugees, coastal erosion, building codes, community, coordination, oversight.