Klas: Justice Departments demands for your data are a suspicious fishing expedition

Published: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 10:15 am

DOJ's Voter Data Request Sparks Controversy Ahead of Midterm Elections

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is facing scrutiny over its recent requests to numerous states for voter data, including sensitive personal information like driver's license and Social Security numbers. The DOJ claims it needs the data to ensure compliance with the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, ostensibly to combat illegal voting. However, critics, including election experts, are raising concerns about the true motives behind the request, particularly in the lead-up to the midterm elections.

The DOJ's actions have been described as an "unprecedented effort to seize power" and a "fishing expedition." Experts suggest the administration may be building a national citizenship data system to identify non-citizen voting, a problem deemed "minuscule and random" by studies. Some fear the data could be used to fuel false claims and conspiracy theories about election security, potentially undermining public trust in the electoral process and discouraging voter participation.

The DOJ's request has been met with resistance from state election officials across the political spectrum. Several states, citing privacy concerns and state laws, are refusing to provide the requested data or are only providing publicly available information. Some officials have directly challenged the DOJ's authority, emphasizing the importance of state control over election administration. The lack of a clear plan for data security from the DOJ has further fueled concerns about potential breaches and misuse of sensitive personal information.

This is not the first time the administration has sought voter data. A previous attempt to create a commission to audit voter files was met with resistance and ultimately disbanded. The current situation raises questions about the balance of power between the federal government and the states, as well as the potential for political manipulation of voter data.

BNN's Perspective:

While ensuring election integrity is a valid goal, the DOJ's actions raise serious questions about overreach and potential political motivations. The lack of transparency and the resistance from state officials suggest a lack of trust in the process. The administration should clearly articulate its reasons for requesting the data and provide robust assurances regarding data security to alleviate concerns and maintain public confidence in the electoral process.

Keywords: DOJ, voter data, midterm elections, election integrity, voter privacy, voter fraud, National Voter Registration Act, Help America Vote Act, state elections, election administration, data security, Donald Trump, Pam Bondi, voter files, non-citizen voting, federal government, state government

Full Story