ICE and CBPs use of facial recognition technology needs guardrails now
3 minute readPublished: Thursday, November 6, 2025 at 11:00 am
ICE and CBP's Use of Facial Recognition Technology Raises Concerns
Recent reports indicate that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are utilizing facial recognition technology (FRT) in the field. According to internal documents, ICE has been employing the Mobile Fortify app, which can identify individuals via facial or fingerprint scans using a smartphone camera. CBP has confirmed its use of the app, stating it is one of many tools used to enforce laws.
The technology has reportedly been deployed in various locations, including Chicago, where agents have used it on individuals, including young people and a U.S. citizen who was asked to submit to a scan. These actions have raised concerns about potential constitutional violations.
The Supreme Court's recent decision in *Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo* has further complicated the situation. The court allowed ICE to consider factors like race and ethnicity in immigration-related stops, which has led to increased scrutiny of the agency's practices. Reports indicate that U.S. citizens have been detained by ICE, with some alleging physical abuse.
Currently, there is no federal legislation specifically governing the use of FRT. This lack of regulation is being exploited by law enforcement agencies, potentially infringing on the rights of those targeted. The article highlights the need for a federal ban on FRT use without express congressional authorization, and only in cases involving violent crimes.
The potential implications of FRT extend beyond immigration enforcement. The article also touches on the possibility of the Justice Department using FRT in elections, which could lead to a constitutional crisis. The scenario involves the use of FRT to verify voter identity, potentially leading to disputes and challenges to election results.
BNN's Perspective:
The use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement agencies presents a complex challenge. While the technology may offer benefits in terms of security and law enforcement, the potential for abuse and the erosion of civil liberties cannot be ignored. A balanced approach is needed, one that allows for the responsible use of FRT while implementing robust safeguards to protect individual rights and prevent discriminatory practices. Clear federal guidelines and oversight are essential to ensure accountability and transparency in the use of this powerful technology.
Keywords: Facial recognition technology, FRT, ICE, CBP, Mobile Fortify, immigration enforcement, constitutional rights, Supreme Court, Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, voter verification, election monitoring, federal legislation, civil liberties.