Federal Judge Blocks Trumps Order to Strip Foreign Service Bargaining Rights

Published: Thursday, May 15, 2025 at 8:04 pm

Judge Halts Trump Order Stripping Foreign Service Workers' Bargaining Rights

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a Trump administration order that aimed to strip foreign service workers of their collective bargaining rights. The ruling, issued Tuesday, grants a preliminary injunction requested by the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA), which sued the administration over the order.

The judge's decision centers on the interpretation of the Statute, emphasizing that Congress intended to extend labor protections broadly to foreign service departments and agencies. The judge highlighted concerns that removing bargaining agreements would negatively impact employees, particularly as the administration undertakes federal government restructuring and potential layoffs.

The AFSA argued that the order undermines their ability to represent members at a crucial time, with the State Department and USAID signaling and beginning large-scale reorganization efforts and reductions-in-force. USAID, specifically, is already implementing layoffs scheduled for July 1, 2025, and September 2, 2025. These changes include consolidating region-specific functions, eliminating redundant offices, and ending programs deemed misaligned with U.S. national interests.

The administration's lawyers argued that the injunction would interfere with the President's ability to address national security concerns, a domain where courts typically defer to the executive branch. However, the judge disagreed, stating that the administration was improperly framing decisions related to general welfare as national security matters without sufficient legal justification.

Tom Yazdgerdi, president of the AFSA, hailed the ruling as a victory for the integrity of the Foreign Service and the accountability and transparency of its member agencies.

BNN's Perspective: This ruling underscores the ongoing tension between executive power and the rights of federal employees. While the administration's stated goals of streamlining government and addressing national security are valid, the judge's decision suggests a need for a more legally sound approach that respects established labor protections. This case highlights the importance of balancing efficiency with the well-being of the workforce, especially during periods of significant organizational change.

Keywords: Trump, foreign service, collective bargaining, injunction, federal judge, AFSA, USAID, State Department, layoffs, labor rights, national security, government restructuring, Tom Yazdgerdi, preliminary injunction, federal government, bargaining rights, American Foreign Service Association, reductions-in-force, executive order, legal battle

Full Story