Ethics Watchdog Group Seeks Investigation Into Border Czar and Contracts Following ProPublica Report

Published: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 5:35 pm

Watchdog Calls for Investigation into Border Czar's Office

A government watchdog is demanding an investigation into potential conflicts of interest and ethics violations within the office of border czar Tom Homan. The Campaign Legal Center (CLC), a nonpartisan organization, has requested that the Department of Homeland Security's Inspector General launch an inquiry. This call follows reports from ProPublica and MSNBC detailing potential improper relationships between Homan, his senior advisor Mark Hall, and various consultants and firms seeking government contracts.

The CLC's request centers on several key concerns. One involves a meeting in August between Hall, a consultant named Charlie Sowell, and representatives from Industrial Tent Systems, a company interested in securing contracts for immigrant detention centers. Sowell had previously paid Hall a $50,000 consulting fee shortly before Hall joined Homan's office. Furthermore, Sowell had a prior business relationship with Homan, advising clients seeking DHS contracts through Sowell's firm, SE&M Solutions.

The CLC also cites a report that Homan received a $50,000 cash payment from undercover FBI agents posing as potential DHS contractors. The watchdog argues that these interactions raise serious questions about the impartiality of government decision-making, especially given the recent allocation of $45 billion by Congress to expand immigration detention spaces. This influx of funding has intensified interest from DHS contractors and consultants, some of whom have past business ties to Homan and Hall.

While Homan has stated he recused himself from all contracting matters, reports suggest he has been involved in conversations with industry players about contracts. The CLC has also filed a separate ethics complaint, alleging that Homan may have intentionally omitted information from his financial disclosure statements.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson has dismissed the calls for an investigation, defending Homan's integrity and calling the reports "debunked left-wing talking points." Jackson has stated that Homan is not involved in awarding contracts and that Hall was not authorized to represent him. However, the CLC maintains that an independent investigation is necessary to determine whether federal ethics laws were violated.

BNN's Perspective: The allegations surrounding the border czar's office are concerning and warrant a thorough investigation. While the White House has dismissed the claims, the potential for conflicts of interest, especially given the significant financial resources allocated to immigration detention, demands transparency and accountability. An independent review is crucial to maintain public trust and ensure that government decisions are made in the best interest of the public.

Keywords: Tom Homan, Mark Hall, ethics violations, conflicts of interest, government contracts, Department of Homeland Security, Inspector General, Campaign Legal Center, immigration detention, financial disclosure, recusal, ProPublica, MSNBC, FBI, White House.

Full Story