Democratic attorneys general rally for birthright citizenship after Supreme Court arguments

Published: Thursday, May 15, 2025 at 6:32 pm

Democratic Attorneys General Defend Birthright Citizenship at Supreme Court

Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court, several Democratic attorneys general rallied to defend birthright citizenship, a right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The attorneys general, representing states involved in the litigation, voiced their opposition to a potential challenge to this fundamental right.

The core of their argument centers on the principle that anyone born in the United States is a citizen, regardless of their parents' legal status. They emphasized the personal significance of birthright citizenship, with Connecticut Attorney General William Tong sharing his own experience as the first American citizen in his family.

While the Supreme Court arguments touched upon President Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, the primary focus was on the use of nationwide injunctions issued by federal judges. The attorneys general raised concerns about the potential consequences of abolishing these injunctions, particularly regarding the citizenship status of children who move between states. They questioned whether a child's citizenship could be jeopardized based on the legal actions of the attorney general in their new state of residence.

The attorneys general argued that nationwide injunctions are necessary to protect fundamental rights, especially when the executive branch attempts to alter long-standing constitutional interpretations. They pointed out that the Supreme Court has previously affirmed birthright citizenship in the landmark case *United States v. Wong Kim Ark*.

BNN's Perspective:

The debate over birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions is complex. While the attorneys general's defense of birthright citizenship aligns with established legal precedent and the 14th Amendment, the concerns about the scope and use of nationwide injunctions are valid. Finding a balance that protects individual rights while ensuring judicial efficiency is crucial.

Keywords: birthright citizenship, 14th Amendment, Supreme Court, attorneys general, nationwide injunctions, citizenship, United States, Trump, legal, constitutional, executive order, Wong Kim Ark, Democratic, legal precedent, federal judges

Full Story