Citing AP investigation, new bill seeks to prohibit DHS from using full-body restraints

Published: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 at 4:28 pm

New Bill Targets Homeland Security's Use of Full-Body Restraints

A new bill introduced in the House of Representatives aims to prohibit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using a full-body restraint device known as the WRAP. The "Full Body Restraint Prohibition Act," sponsored by Representative Delia Ramirez, would ban future purchases of the device and establish oversight and reporting requirements.

The legislation follows an Associated Press (AP) investigation that revealed instances of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a part of DHS, using the WRAP on individuals, sometimes for extended periods during deportation flights. The AP's investigation highlighted concerns about the device's use, including its application on individuals who were already shackled, allegedly for intimidation or punishment.

The WRAP, manufactured by Safe Restraints Inc., has been the subject of several federal lawsuits. Critics argue that its improper use can be akin to punishment or even torture. The AP investigation also uncovered a dozen fatal cases in the last decade where local law enforcement used the WRAP, with autopsies indicating the restraint played a role in the deaths.

DHS has not responded to detailed questions from the AP regarding the use of the WRAP, nor has it commented on the new bill. However, the AP found that ICE has used the device despite internal concerns raised in a 2023 DHS civil rights division report.

Federal purchasing records show that DHS has spent $268,523 on the WRAP since late 2015. The majority of this spending occurred during the Trump administrations. Safe Restraints Inc. CEO Charles Hammond maintains the WRAP is a safer alternative to other restraint methods. He also stated that a modified version of the device was created for ICE, allowing for its use during flights and long bus trips.

The AP's investigation prompted a group of Democratic senators to express serious human rights concerns regarding ICE's use of the WRAP on deportation flights.

BNN's Perspective: While the concerns raised about the WRAP's use are valid and warrant investigation, a complete ban could potentially hinder law enforcement's ability to manage difficult situations. Striking a balance between ensuring the safety of both detainees and officers while upholding human rights is crucial. The bill's emphasis on oversight and reporting is a positive step toward achieving this balance.

Keywords: DHS, ICE, WRAP, Full Body Restraint, Legislation, Deportation Flights, Human Rights, Safe Restraints Inc., Delia Ramirez, AP Investigation, Restraints, Law Enforcement

Full Story